1

No, not *more* feminine!!!

Submitted by Michelle on November 15, 2007 - 09:09.

Re Raymond's comment: please *don't* make it any more feminine than it is at this moment. It already looks like a spread from Real Simple minus the whitespace. I do read the magazine as a "guilty pleasure," but mostly because all of the "women's magazines" my grandma reads are total visual overload, stuff crammed into every corner. Anyway, this design is already plenty pale and fussy. (And there's the thing about the tiny comment font, but I emailed you all about that before you put the open mic up.)

Reply

Please keep the comments civil and on-topic. Abusive or inappropriate comments will be removed without warning. By posting here you agree to our terms of use.

The content of this field is kept private and will not be shown publicly.
If you leave a link (include the http:// part), your name will be linked to your homepage.

You may use some HTML for formatting: <strong>bold text</strong>, <em>italics</em>, and <a href="">for links</a>. Empty lines are automatically converted to paragraph breaks.

Or click the link above that says 'enable rich-text' to use the fancy editor.

Captcha
This question is for testing whether you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.
1 + 5 =
Solve this simple math problem and enter the result. E.g. for 1+3, enter 4.

Have more to say? Join the discussions at Wise Bread's Finance and Frugality Forums.

Finance Blogs - Blog Top Sites