Top 20 savvy living stories you missed this year

A look at the 20 stories in 2006 that touched my life in a positive, non-inappropriate kind of way.
Savvy Living Stories From Awesome People
- Hungry for a Month: "How I Ate for $1 a Day" — Learn how this bloger budgeted food costs to $1 per day.
- Where "Check Please" Is Your Call — This restaurant lets you decide how much to pay!
- Nothing New Here — And That's the Point — 10 friends live second hand for a year
- Top 10 Advantages of Low-Rent Living — When it pays to live in low-rent housing.
- You Can Learn a Lot From a Rich Girl — Guerilla tactics for obliterating debt.
- Surprise: Not-So-Glamorous Conservation Works Best — High school teacher reduces electric bill by two-thirds.
Consumer Tips and Protection
- Should You Sign the Backs of Your Credit Cards? — There's a safer way to do it.
- What Is Telstar Logistics? — Urban camouflage lets these guys park anywhere.
Just Plain Cool
- What Different Parts of the World Eat in One Week — Excerpts from Hungry Planet.
- Ten Recurring Economic Fallacies — History repeats itself!
- The High Cost of Being Poor — Food costs, insurance...poverty is expensive.
- Marriage Is for White People — Marriage rates have dropped for the black community.
- Empty Stomach Intelligence — Being hungry makes you smarter.
- Don't Misunderestimate Yourself — Why people think their rivals are better than they actually are.
I hope you enjoy these stories as much as I have. If you feel cheated because you've actually read all these stories before, you should give me a call.
Using Reddit for News
I found all the stories above through reddit, the best social bookmarking community around. I wanted to point that out because it seems that despite the increase of diversity in the blogosphere, a lot of the information is still being channeled through a select group of elite bloggers.
Nielsen BuzzMetrics recently reported that a "small cluster of power bloggers — focused on politics, blogging and humor -— were responsible for the top 100 blog posts for 2006."
If Time magazine is right about the Internet being a "tool for bringing together the small contributions of millions of people and making them matter," then shouldn't more individual blogs be involved too?
This is why reddit is so valuable and why I tell people about it every chance I get (case in point: now). The stories I listed above all made the front page of reddit. And none of them were produced by so-called uber blogs.
Many of the articles I posted are truly grassroots stories that are intensely personal and interesting — and if you weren't reading reddit, you might've missed them.
Reddit vs Digg
Digg is also a great news source but it has a tendency to bury some of the more unique stories. All of the stories on my list were submitted to both Digg and reddit. While all those stories made reddit's front page, many of them languished in Digg obscurity. For example:
Compare that with:
I know this is a very unscientifically small sample, but this was one of the top human interest stories of the year. Leaving it off Digg's home page is like asking Michael Jordan to sit out a couple of All Star games. The $1 a day story did make a splash on Digg a bit later as a repost — 24 days later. Better late than never, I suppose.
I can't tell you why reddit succeeds where Digg has failed. But here's my personal thanks to the reddit team. Please keep that little alien up and running so I can continue to explore all the wonderful complexities of the human experience the blogosphere has to offer.
Disclaimer: The links and mentions on this site may be affiliate links. But they do not affect the actual opinions and recommendations of the authors.
Wise Bread is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to amazon.com.
The fact that a story gets 400 points on reddit and less than 30 on digg is so weird. How come the populations of reddit and digg are so different... we need some demographic stats here
It would be interesting to see the demographics of reddit and digg users -- and what percentage of them vote for stories. I think reddit is much smaller, and therefore has more of a community that sees value in voting stories up/down. Digg on the other hand, has grown faster, and I think it was lost the community, but retains a clique that holds sway over what stories make it to the top.
My unscientific 2-cents anyway ...
BTW ... I did read a few of your stories this year, via reddit. Without reddit, I wouldn't have read them.
Digg is for the children. Reddit is for teens. NewsTrust ( http://beta.newstrust.net/ ) is for adults. (At last, something for the adults.)
Just out of curiosity, is it hard to get reviewers to answer so many questions? This report is very interesting, I might give this service a try.
JC, that would be an interesting project. I also wonder how much of the difference is the demographics and how much of it is the result of the user interface.
For example, the fact that reddit doesn't force you to pick a "category" might contribute to the diversity of the news posted.
Also, reddit doesn't have an intro paragraph, so the news posted has to be interesting and quirky based on the merit of the title alone, which might act as a filter against boring news.
Deen, I think the size of the community matters too. Somehow reddit has retained that tight-knit feeling of trust and camaraderie that I don't get at any other social bookmarking websites.
Thanks for reading our stories and commenting on them. By the way, your blog looks great. I didn't know that imageshack can host dynamic slide shows like that.